11/16/2023 0 Comments Joe freshLitigation can be satisfying - and rewarding - when framed as going after the fat cats and standing up for the dispossessed. Moral posturing is easy - and in the case of John Oliver even funny. The claim suggests, essentially, that given the record of previous Bangladeshi workplace tragedies, Joe Fresh should have known that those sewing clothes for it at the Rana Plaza were in moral danger, and that subcontractors were paying “extremely low wages.” This brings us to Loblaw’s second undesirable delivery: the $2 billion class action lawsuit filed last week by Toronto law firm Rochon Genova on behalf of victims of Rana Plaza. and its Joe Fresh clothing line in a proposed class action lawsuit related to the 2013 Bangladesh garment factory collapse that killed more than 1,100 workers. Article contentĪ Toronto law firm is seeking $2 billion in damages from Loblaw Cos. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. “This is going to keep happening as long as we let it,” Oliver concluded, “We need to show them.” The factory contained many companies that manufactured clothing for big name retailers, including Joe Fresh. Oliver’s food fight comes just two years after the collapse of the factory building at Rana Plaza in Bangladesh, where 1,129 people died. Corporate executives wouldn’t eat a lunch subcontracted out by someone who couldn’t vouch for its ingredients, yet they claim the bad news from factories comes as a surprise. Oliver’s point was that, despite professed concerns about sweatshops and unsafe working conditions that have been around for 20 years, we keep hearing stories of child labour, building collapses and fires.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |